Recent revelations have encouraged me to rethink the bible. It started with an observation of harsh arguments regarding the ‘real’ bible as opposed to the ‘rewritten bible’ or a bible where important books have been removed and hidden. Anyone who knows anything about me knows that I love the scriptures. I quote them constantly and I have a good working knowledge of them for easy application. I operate from the premise of understanding that we are creations of a divine being much larger than we could possibly comprehend. He’s certainly big enough to preserve the knowledge He needs us to have in order to reestablish a covenant relationship with Him.
That being said, the traditional church doctrine of the bible as ‘the infallible word of God’ is a false doctrine. I know that’s provocative so please let me explain.
- There are multiple versions of the bible translated differently.
- There are versions of the bible paraphrased.
- There are inconsistencies in biblical accounts of the same event.
- Our current bible looks nothing like the first century scriptures and there are missing pieces.
A friend recently asked me: So what do we do? Throw out all the bibles?
Absolutely not! We put the scriptures back in their proper role and stop allowing the bible to become an idol. Ever think about that? Is the bible an idol to modern Christians? What is its proper function?
What did Jesus and His apostles consider scripture?
When Jesus spoke to the Pharisees about not knowing the scriptures, to what scriptures did He refer? The Old Testament, obviously. These were the Jewish teachers of the law, they had memorized the scriptures without understanding. And they also had scriptures that we are likely unfamiliar with. Some of the scriptures they would have had include Jubilees, Maccabees, Enochs, Esdras, Judith, Baruch, chapters from Daniel (Bel and the Dragon), etc. They had scriptural knowledge that today’s average pastor and evangelist do not have. In fact, most modern Christians would call these books ‘extra biblical or not scripture’. Jesus did not.
When Jesus said ‘If you believed Moses, you would believe Me; for he wrote of Me”, He was likely speaking of the scriptural text called Jubilees. This book is very similar to Genesis with a few caveats. Jubilees was written by Moses on Mt. Sinai at the instruction of the angel of the Presence (of God). Moses was born during Egyptian captivity and raised as an Egyptian Prince worshipping Egyptian gods. He would not have been taught Hebraic history. He would have held an Egyptian worldview. Once Moses left Egypt, he settled in Midian and married the daughter of Jethro, a priest. We don’t know what he was a priest of. We know that the Midianites were of Abraham’s line by Keturah, they were not the chosen portion. In fact, Keturah’s sons joined Ishmael and became the Arabs. We know that Jethro met with Moses during the Exodus and worshipped God at that time. We also know that Gideon later had to defeat the Midianites who worshipped Baal. We have no reason to believe that Moses had any knowledge of the history of Israel before God encountered him and commanded him to return to Egypt. So how could Moses have possibly written Jubilees with such accuracy as compared to Genesis?
Where did our version of Bible come from?
Many have been led to say that Moses wrote Genesis as well. There’s no evidence that this is true… only that it matches to Jubilees. In fact, Jubilees demonstrates that Genesis was a family history recorded across the generations leading up to Abraham. Abraham took those books and transcribed them from the ancient Hebrew spoken before Babel. It’s much more likely that Genesis was an ongoing family history first written by Enoch, continued by Noah, then transcribed and continued by Abram. There’s no reason to conclude that Moses had anything to do with Genesis… other than the fact that Jubilees seems to echo Genesis closely. When we take the two accounts together, it becomes obvious why Jubilees was not included in our modern canon. It speaks to Mastema being the Prince of Demons and approaching God as the accuser (the devil). It speaks to the demonic influences that remain in this realm to tempt, ensuring free will. It describes creation in greater detail, demonstrating that Adam and Eve were not the first and only two humans created. It explains that Enoch still lives and is in the Garden of Eden writing the testimony of all generations until the day of judgment. It contradicts many taught church doctrines and common understandings… what it does not contradict is the actual text of Genesis.
I want to propose a timeline… not that this is fact, but a possibility to consider:
- Circa 30 AD: Jesus of Nazareth dies, resurrects and ascends
- Circa 35- 100 AD: The Apostles establish the church- small groups of believers in major port cities spreading the gospel (not the scriptures or law) among all people.
- Circa 100 AD: Many believers have been killed, but mission accomplished- Tribulation begins (Revelation 1- 19)
- Circa 110 AD: Christ returns (Revelation 20)
- Circa 110-1110 AD: Millennial reign- beautiful architecture remains
- Circa 1110 AD: First resurrection, the deceiver (Mastema) is released
At this point, everything created during the reign of Christ is still available. Mastema sets about destroying, obscuring, and altering all understanding of the Millenial reign and of the original faith. We call this historical era “The Dark Ages”. Then the deceiver sets up a false ‘church’ with twisted doctrine based on twisted scripture and creates a history for it. This church uses Illuminati influenced structures and teachings and calls it the true faith. After a few hundred years, believers begin to question this false church (synagogue of Satan) and break away, yet Mastema uses this to further create confusion and chaos.
The beginning of the ‘real bible’
A new version of the bible is written, and another, and another… then in the 1500’s The Puritans gain popularity under Queen Elizabth I as she restores England to Protestantism (1158-1603). These Puritans approach King James of England. In 1604, King James presides over a meeting of Puritan leaders and Anglican bishops at the Hampton Court Conference. Reforms to the established church are discussed. King James rejects Puritan challenges to church government, citing an observation that He had learned in Scotland: “No Bishop, no King”. He rejects changes to the Common Book of Prayer. However, he seizes an opportunity to have an Authorized (by himself) version of the bible compiled. The Anglican Bishops agree.
Over the next six years, King James approves a list of 54 translators to review the Masoretic Texts, the Septuagint, extant English translations and Jewish commentaries to guide their work. 47 of these translators participate and are organized into six groups, two working from Cambridge, two from Oxford, and two from Westminster Abbey. An elaborate set of rules is devised to ensure ‘individual proclivities’ do not influence the work. Each group is given a section of the existing bible to translate and, as they work, all translation is overseen by the Archbishop of Canterbury through a series of doctrinal conventions. This ensures ‘consistency’.
This new ‘authorized’ version of the bible is published in two editions in 1611, one being called the “He and She” version because of a variant reading in Ruth. Another edition is published in 1631 called the “Wicked Bible” because the Tan Commandments read “Thou shalt commit adultery”. Yet, in addition to printing errors in subsequent editions, the 1611 King James Version is obviously heavily influenced by doctrine, church politics, and a thirst for power. It was never about getting back to the original scriptures as is evidenced with the arrest of William Penn in 1664 for preaching a doctrine of “Friends” (Quakers).
In this series of events, the deceiver (Mastema) creates a church based on false light. He then creates a bible that has flaws and submits to doctrines of men. The Institution of Church, already established, uses this bible to reinforce its doctrines, and teaches the devout that the bible is:
- the infallible word of God,
- Complete in all its ways
- In need of interpretation by the ecclesia
- Supportive of their individual doctrines,
- What the apostles meant by scripture…
- This is all that makes it different from other religious texts
nd just like that, the Holy scriptures are beyond question and replace the Holy Spirit as a guide to Jesus Christ. The Church determines what we consider scripture. The Church and its doctrines determine our understanding of God and the spiritual. We have a major problem.
God knew exactly what would happen in this season of deception. As faith is increasingly corrupted, we find ancient manuscripts in caves. We can see where things were added to the Masoretic texts. We can see where words like gospel, baptize and Lucifer were transliterated to accommodate the doctrinal positions of the church. We can see where some ideas were completely altered (the concept of a Divine Council, the understanding of Adam and Eve, the concept of a spirit realm and how it has always interacted with humanity, the entities called Mastema and Azazel) by translating terms like sons of God to sons of Israel in places where it makes no sense at all. Today, entire denominations will come against more accurate translations as a perversion of ‘scripture’ in defence of their own doctrinal understanding.
And this is the issue… the bible is an idol. It is now used as a weapon and made to conform to a doctrine. Our doctrines should be made to conform to the scriptures… and all the scriptures. The scriptures that Jesus and Matthew, Peter and Paul, James, Jude and John would have considered scriptures. This includes nothing of the New Testament. The New Testament consists of Gospels and the Apostles’ doctrine, both of which are critical to our understanding of God and covenant relationship; and neither of which are scripture as referred to by Jesus and the biblical writers.
So no, we do not throw out our bibles! We recognize them for what they are… A guidebook given by God. We recognize the Holy Spirit as our guide into all truth. We recognize that we find God when we seek Him with all of our heart, not when we pick up an easily accessed book. We recognize that Jesus Christ is the infallible Word of God… not the stories about Him.
We search the scriptures… what Jesus meant by the scriptures… not because we think that in them we have eternal life, but because they point us to the way, the truth and the life that can only be found in Him.
Relevant verses from the accepted canon and some counterparts from Jubilees:
0 Comments